RESUMO Objetivo: Esse estudo propõe descrever um método semiológico simples e acurado, por meio de uma manobra específica com o membro inferior, a fim de direcionar a investigação semiológica para as tendinopatias dos glúteos médio e mínimo. Métodos: Participaram do estudo 50 pacientes, com média de idade de 44,1 ± 13,0 anos, apresentando dor persistente na face lateral do quadril há mais de 3 meses. A RM foi adotada como padrão ouro, para fins de comparação entre as duas manobras semiológicas (FABREX (teste proposto) e teste de Lequesne) no diagnóstico das tendinopatias do glúteo médio e mínimo. Resultados: O FABREX apresentou alta sensibilidade e moderada especificidade para tendinopatia de glúteo médio e alta sensibilidade e especificidade para tendinopatia do glúteo mínimo. Conclusão: A manobra proposta, quando positiva, pode ser utilizada para determinar o diagnóstico de tendinopatias glútea (alta especificidade). Além disso, possui alta sensibilidade, descartando o diagnóstico quando negativa. O presente trabalho constitui o passo inicial para validação do teste de FABREX, podendo assim, ser considerado um procedimento simples e acurado para identificar pacientes com ou sem tendinopatias glúteas. Nível de Evidência III, Estudo de Caso Controle.

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aims to describe a simple and accurate semiological method executing a specific maneuver with the lower limb to direct the semiological investigation towards the tendinopathies in the gluteus medius and minimus. Methods: Fifty patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 44.1 ± 13 years, with persistent pain on the side of the hip for more than three months. To compare the FABREX (proposed test) and Lequesne semiological tests, in the diagnosis of tendinopathies in the gluteus medius and minimus, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was adopted as the gold standard. Results: FABREX presented high sensitivity and moderate specificity for tendinopathy in the gluteus medius and high sensitivity and specificity for tendinopathy in the gluteus minimus. Conclusion: The proposed test, when positive, can be used to determine the diagnosis of gluteal tendinopathies (high specificity). Moreover, it has high sensitivity, excluding the diagnosis when negative. This study represents the initial step for validating the FABREX test, and can therefore be considered a simple and accurate procedure to identify patients with or without gluteal tendinopathies. Level of Evidence III, Case Control Study.

Resumo Os autores relatam um único caso de artroplastia total de quadril primária complexa em uma paciente do sexo feminino de 34 anos, com dismetria de membros inferiores de 5,5 cm, na qual foi feita tenotomia do glúteo máximo a fim de prevenir lesão do nervo ciático. Tal cirurgia foi feita sob monitoração eletroneurofisiológica dos ramos fibular e tibial do nervo ciático. Foramcoletados dados pré-tenotomia, pós-tenotomia e pós-redução artroplástica. Os achados demonstram que a tenotomia do glúteo máximo melhorou a reposta motora do componente fibular do nervo ciático.

Abstract The authors report a single case of complex primary hip total arthroplasty in a 34-yearold female patient with a 5.5 cm lower limb dysmetria, in whom a maximum gluteus tenotomy was performed in order to prevent sciatic nerve injury. The surgery was performed under electroneurophysiological monitoring of the fibular and tibial branches of the sciatic nerve, collecting pretenotomy, posttenotomy, and postarthroplasty reduction data. The findings demonstrate that the maximum gluteus tenotomy improved the motor response of the fibular component of the sciatic nerve.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar, por meio de ensaio biomecânico, a resistência e a energia necessária para ocorrência de fratura do fêmur proximal em osso sintético após retirada de um modelo de haste de fêmur proximal (PFN) e comparar os resultados obtidos com técnica de reforço com polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA). Métodos Foram usados 15 ossos sintéticos: cinco unidades para o grupo controle (GC), cinco para o grupo teste sem reforço (GTS) e cinco para grupo teste com reforço (GTC). A análise biomecânica foi feita e simulou queda sobre o trocânter com máquina servo-hidráulica. No GC, o ensaio foi feito com sua integridade intacta. Nos grupos GTS e GTC, foi introduzido um modelo de PFN e os ensaios foram feitos no GTS, após simples retirada do material de síntese, e no GTC, após retirada do mesmo modelo de haste e preenchimento do pertuito no colo com PMMA. Resultado Todos os grupos apresentaram fratura basocervical. O grupo GC apresentou média 1.427,39 Newtons (N) de carga máxima e 10,14 Joules (J) de energia para a ocorrência da fratura. Os grupos GTS e GTC apresentaram 892,14 N e 1.477,80 N de carga máxima e 6,71 J e 11,99 J de energia, respectivamente. Segundo a Anova de Kruskal-Wallis, existe diferença significativa na carga máxima (p = 0,009) e na energia (p = 0,007) entre esses grupos. Conclusão A simples retirada de um PFN em osso sintético apresentou redução significativa da carga máxima e da energia para a ocorrência de fratura, que foram reestabelecidas com uma técnica de reforço com PMMA.

Abstract Objective To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Methods Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA. Results All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load (p = 0.009) and energy (p = 0.007) between these groups. Conclusion The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA.

Objetivo:Analisar estatisticamente resultados obtidos em ensaios biomecânicos de fixação de fratura do colo femoral tipo Pauwels III, em osso sintético, com o uso do sistema dinâmico do quadril (DHS) com parafuso antirrotatório vs um grupo controle.Métodos:Foram usados dez ossos sintéticos, de um fabricante nacional, do modelo C1010, divididos em dois grupos: teste e controle. No grupo teste foi feita fixação de osteotomia, com 70° de inclinação em nível de colo femoral, com o uso de DHS com parafuso antirrotatório. Avaliou-se a resistência dessa fixação e seu desvio rotacional em 5 mm de deslocamento (fase 1) e em 10 mm de deslocamento, considerado como falência da síntese (fase 2). No grupo controle, os modelos foram ensaiados em sua integridade até que ocorresse a fratura do colo femoral.Resultados:Os valores do ensaio no grupo teste na fase 1, nas amostras de 1 a 5, foram: 1.512 N, 1.439 N, 1.205 N, 1.251 N e 1.273 N, respectivamente (média = 1.336 N; desvio padrão DP] = 132 N). Os desvios rotacionais foram: 4,90°; 3,27°; 2,62°; 0,66° e 0,66°, respectivamente (média = 2,42°; DP = 1,81°). Na fase 2, obtivemos: 2.064N, 1.895 N, 1.682N, 1.713 N e 1.354N, respectivamente (média = 1.742 N; DP = 265 N). Os valores da carga de falência no grupo controle foram: 1.544N, 1.110N, 1.359N, 1.194N e 1.437N, respectivamente (média = 1.329N; DP = 177 N). A análise estatística pelo teste de Mann-Whitney demonstrou que o grupo teste apresentou carga máxima, em 10 mm de deslocamento, significativamente maior do que a carga de falência do grupo controle (p = 0,047).Conclusão:A resistência mecânica do grupo teste foi significativamente superior à do grupo controle.

Objective:To statistically analyze the results obtained from biomechanical tests on fixation of femoral neck fractures of Pauwels III type, in synthetic bone, using the dynamic hip system with an anti-rotation screw, versus a control group.Methods:Ten synthetic bones from a Brazilian manufacturer (model C1010) were used and divided into two groups: test and control. In the test group, fixation of an osteotomy was performed with 70° of inclination at the level of the femoral neck, using DHS with an anti-rotation screw. The resistance of this fixation was evaluated, along with its rotational deviation at 5 mm of displacement (phase 1) and at 10 mm of displacement (phase 2), which was considered to be failure of synthesis. In the control group, the models were tested in their entirety until femoral neck fracturing occurred.Results:The test values in the test group (samples 1-5) in phase 1 were: 1512N, 1439 N, 1205 N, 1251N and 1273 N, respectively (mean = 1336 N; standard deviation SD] = 132 N). The rotational deviations were: 4.90°, 3.27°, 2.62°, 0.66° and 0.66°, respectively (mean = 2.42°; SD = 1.81°). In phase 2, we obtained: 2064 N, 1895 N, 1682 N, 1713 N and 1354 N, respectively (mean = 1742 N; SD = 265N). The failure loading values in the control group were: 1544 N, 1110 N, 1359 N, 1194 N and 1437 N, respectively (mean = 1329 N; SD = 177N). The statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test showed that the test group presented maximum loading at a displacement of 10 mm, i.e. significantly greater than the failure loading of the control group (p = 0.047).Conclusion:The mechanical resistance of the test group was significantly greater than that of the control group.

Objective: To analyze statistically results in biomechanical testing of fixation of femoral neck Pauwels type III fractures, on synthetic bone, with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and control group.Methods: Ten synthetic bones of a national brand were used. Test Group: fixation was performed after osteotomy at 70o tilt using DCS plate with four holes. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm displacement and rotational deviation (Step 1) and with10 mm (Step 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred.Results: The values of the test group in Step 1 showed a mean of 974N and SD = 114N. In Stage 2, we obtained on average 1335N and SD = 98N. The values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of the maximum force (N) between the test group and the control, in Step 2, demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the DCS and control plates (p = 0.91).Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the DCS boards and the control group exposed to full resistance. Level of Evidence III, Case Control.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of biomechanical assays of fixation of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture in synthetic bone, using 7.5mm cannulated screws in inverted triangle formation, in relation to the control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones were used, from a domestic brand, divided into two groups: test and control. In the test group, a 70° tilt osteotomy of the femoral neck was fixated using three cannulated screws in inverted triangle formation. The resistance of this fixation and its rotational deviation were analyzed at 5mm displacement (phase 1) and 10mm displacement (phase 2). The control group was tested in its integrity until the fracture of the femoral neck occurred. The Mann-Whitney test was used for group analysis and comparison. RESULTS: The values in the test group in phase 1, in samples 1-5, showed a mean of 579N and SD =77N. Rotational deviations showed a mean of 3.33°, SD = 2.63°. In phase 2, the mean was 696N and SD =106N. The values of the maximum load in the control group had a mean of 1329N and SD=177N. CONCLUSION: The analysis of mechanical strength between the groups determined a statistically significant lower value in the test group. Level of Evidence III, Control Case.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixation of 70(o) tilt femoral neck osteotomy was performed using three 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm of displacement, and rotational deviation (phase 1) and with 10 mm offset (phase 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: the values of the test group in phase 1, in sample 1-5 had a mean of 517N and SD = 96N. Rotational deviations showed a mean of 3.79° e SD = 2. 03°. In phase 2, mean was 649N and SD = 94N. The values of the maximum load in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N; respectively. Statistical analysis between the groups showed a statistically significant lower value in the test group. CONCLUSION: the analysis of mechanical resistance between the groups has determined statistically significant value for the test group. Level of Evidence III, Case-control Study.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a relação entre lesões abdominais e a introdução de fios guia em ensaios cirúrgicos do quadril, propor um sistema de escorização e conduta médica em função da distância percorrida pelo fio guia a partir da placa quadrilátera e a estrutura anatômica lesionada. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se 18 quadris de cadáveres, um fio de Steimann de 3.2 x 300 mm, um perfurador elétrico e um paquímetro. Introduziu-se o fio no centro do colo femoral por via de acesso lateral no quadril sob visualização direta. Por via de acesso abdominal mediana longitudinal estendida à região pélvica, observou-se a placa quadrilátera até o fio a transfixar. A partir deste ponto, prolongou-se a inserção por mais 140 mm, a fim de observar seu trajeto abdominal e descrever as lesões apresentadas em função da distância percorrida. RESULTADOS: Houve cinco (27%) lesões de cólon sigmóide e uma (5%) lesão transfixante do nervo obturador. Artérias e veias ilíacas comuns contra laterais ao quadril fixado não foram lesionadas. CONCLUSÃO: O fio guia não deve ultrapassar a placa quadrilátera. Medidas de prevenção são importantes no pré e intra-operatório e o escore e a conduta médica propostos neste estudo devem ser criteriosamente observados nos casos de lesão comprovada.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the relationship between abdominal injuries and the introduction of guide wire in experimental hip surgery, to propose a scoring system and a medical management based on the distance traveled by the guide wire from the quadrilateral plate until the damaged anatomical structure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 18 cadaveric hips, a Steimann pin of 3.2 x 300mm, an electric drill and a caliper were used. The wire was inserted in the center of the femoral neck through a lateral approach in the hip under direct visualization. Via median abdominal extended approach to the pelvic region, the quadrilateral plate was observed until the wire crossed it. From this point the wire was further inserted 140 mm in order to observe its abdominal path and describe the lesions presented based on the distance traveled. RESULTS: There were five lesions (27%) in the sigmoid colon, and one transfixing injury (5%) of the obturator nerve. The common iliac arteries and veins from the contralateral hip were not injured. CONCLUSION: The guide wire must not exceed the quadrilateral plate. Preventive measures are important in the pre- and intra-operatory stages and the score and medical management proposed in this study should be carefully observed in cases of injury.